live well. the message of carl creasman.

Though the country had moved successfully through war, those in charge were not able to handle the situation well.  In other words, at the moment when the country needed the best, the wisest leaders, the leadership in charge was at its weakest.   The weakness of leadership becomes more apparent as we investigate the decisions that were made during the years of the “road to crisis.”  Certainly, at other points during each saeculum, bad political decisions were made, but the sheer number of poor governing decisions made overwhelm the system.  It is almost as if the leaders simply cannot get out of their own way as they make one bad decision after another.  This failure is exacerbated by a growing sense of distance, or isolation, of the people from the government. The current government attempts to put through various acts or laws, in some cases to deal with what it assumes to be normal “business as usual” and in other cases, to deal with an issue that emerged from the previous war.  Regardless, the people’s response to these decisions is almost universally opposition. 

The choices of the government in question not only led to bumbling decisions, but overt opposition.  At this point, the citizens in every crisis period were divided between verbal opposition and active opposition, but clearly the fact that they were going to oppose their own government must be noted.  King Charles II had to avoid more than one assassination attempt and the members of Parliament were as fearful of the people.  In 1685 the Monmouth Uprising became open opposition, just as the actions of groups like the Liberty Boys, the Green Mountain Boys and the Sons of Liberty did 80 years later in 1765.

From the vibrant over opposition to the poor governing decisions, new political voices appear.  The various “Congresses” during the journey to the American Revolution gave rise to perhaps the greatest collection of political leaders in US history.  Yet, they are at least matched with zeal by the new voices in Parliament in the late 1600s, particularly the new Whig party, during the road to the Glorious Revolution.  The Republicans emerging in 1855 and the newly Progressive Democrats of the 1920s both shook up the established order of things politically and brought new ideas and concepts to the fore.

 

Another aspect visible from the patterns is that as we closed in on each Great Crisis, there had been a significant change in communication.  Before the full crisis emerged, rapid communication had become the norm in a new and exciting way.  Before the Glorious Revolution, pamphlet writing to express political views had become the norm.  In the 1770s, the postal service of Benjamin Franklin had made communication between the 13 colonies a thing of beauty.  Quicker still, FDR was able to harness the radio, a technology that had exploded in popularity and use in the 1920s, during the darkest days of the Depression.  Now, citizens could hear Edward R. Murrow speak to them live from the Battle of Britain or find solace in the soothing voice of Roosevelt in his fireside chats.

 

The Great Depression itself is another clue as economic malaise or challenge is one more common aspect to note.  While the Depression itself can be considered to be the Crisis from the last saeculum, it can be noted that the Depression itself is merely a step ON THE ROAD to crisis when only looking at the international issues of the war.    Another pattern point within the last three “roads” is an explosive event that leads to a very controversial government response.  That response, in turn, proved to spark galvanizing action among the citizens.  During the road to the American Revolution, the tea party (the explosive event) led to the British Parliament passing the Coercive Acts.  These acts were very measured, limited, and from England’s point of view, merely aimed at troublesome Boston.  To the colonists, angry along the full Eastern seaboard, the “Intolerable Acts” were evidence of a government response aimed at every American.  Immediately after this came arrival of Minutemen from various states and the gathering in Philadelphia.  Similarly, after the raid on Harper’s Ferry in 1858, the execution of John Brown, also considered measured by the Virginians, sparked action by both north and south.  In the south, as we have already shown, the various state militias became the nucleus of the CSA army; in the north, Republicans were able to show the execution as evidence that the southerners were prepared to act against every American.

 

The last two key concepts are the ones that perhaps should make us the most nervous: “blood in the streets” and the “unforeseen trigger event.”  When the US Army drove into the Bonus Army or when Hitler’s forces rounded up 100s of Jews during Kristallnacht, that sense of open bloodshed should have been familiar to anyone paying attention to the pattern.  Bleeding Kansas of 1854-55 was the same sort of event, even leading to bloodshed inside the Capitol Building the next year.  The Boston Massacre in 1770 and the Monmouth Uprising both brought open bloodshed to the country.   Yet, each road to crisis seems to have a moment when all things could be saved and the crisis averted, were it not for a seemingly innocuous event.  No one could had foreseen that when King Charles was tragically killed via a horse riding accident, his horse stepping into a gopher hole in 1685, that three short years later members of Parliament would invite an invading force under William of Orange to their shores.

 

These common happenings provide us with a template to consider our own times.  As we march deeper in to the second decade of the 21^st century, we must be watchful for these kinds of events.  Some have not happened yet, others perhaps have. Are there matches with the previous “roads?”   If so, what do you do about it?

 

To recap, look at the chart below.  Each of these events comprises the steps on the road to crisis.   They do not always occur in the same order, though all roads began with a victorious war for the nation.  Obviously the actions of government had been different, relevant for the events of that time.  Yet, within this chart, we can see a pattern that, if discerned to be occurring, would be a signal to prepare for our own Great Crisis.

 

The Common Attributes

1. War starting the conflict
2. Weak governmental leadership
3. Poor governing decisions
4. Feeling of distance between government and the people
5. Active opposition to government
6. New political voices
7. Explosive political writing
8. Significant change in communication
9. Economic distress
10. Explosive event®controversial government reaction®galvanized opposition
11. Blood in the streets
12. Unforeseen trigger event propelling government actions that lead to more tension

 

As we consider these attributes, a more ominous aspect must be considered.  It’s not like previous societies have not faced economic distress, a poor choice by the government or someone writing an impactful book that captured the attention of the country.  Ultimately, as we study the history of the previous “roads to crisis,” it becomes apparent that the biggest problem was that people lost the ability, or the desire, to compromise.  The various sides simply lost the ability for discussion.  The growing philosophical divide over whatever the issue was (religion, government style, representation, human rights, economic crisis) became so deep that no middle ground could be reached.  As we move into the second decade of the 21^st century, that reality of no room for compromise seems more and more obvious.

 

*********************

You can read the rest of chapter 12 in Tracking the Storm; the book provides powerful clues about what is coming, rapidly, to the United States.  There is little doubt that a storm is approaching the country, the outer edges of the winds already swirling around us.  What does that portend for the nation?  Through the clues of history, we can find direction and steps to undertake to prepare.  Many believe there won’t be a storm, or maybe that the worst is over. With history as a guide, I demonstrate that we haven’t yet even reached the Great Crisis.

 

Gripping and “a scary yet necessary read,” Tracking the Storm moves through the past 400 years of Anglo-American history to illustrate the various clues provided that show the steps to the coming crisis.  I will tell the story of political instability, economic distress, rapid technological changes and a growing philosophical divide that challenged previous generations.  At the end of each Great Crisis, the nation had been radically changed.  Pick up your copy of Tracking the Storm today!